Yesterday I paid a visit to the Science Museum to try and make sense of all the ideas, objects and themes that are pinging around my head in relation to the new exhibition I’m creating. I originally went to look at the narrative structures the Science Museum uses when talking about telecommunications and how they deal with a historical thread in different themes. But after looking at lots and lots of labels and text panels, my brain started to melt.
One of the aims of ‘my’ exhibition is to explore the difference between art and technology, and to ask questions about what is art and what is data. Can art be data and can data be art? With this in mind, I stumbled into the Listening Post installation by Mark Hansen and Ben Rubin.
It’s a mesmerising experience, classed as a ‘dynamic portrait’ of online communication. The installation displays uncensored fragments of text, sampled in real-time, from public internet chatrooms, which are accompanied by the rhythm of computer-synthesized voices reading – or as some put it “singing” – the words that flicker over the screens. It’s really quite beautiful and you do get lost listening to it. It really does challenge the visitor to think differently about data.
I’m really looking forward to delving deeper into this idea about the different between art and data, or lack thereof, using UCL Art Museum collections as a base for discussion. I’d be interested to know if anyone has any other beautiful examples of installations that blur the boundaries between art and data.
One thought on “Blurring the boundaries between art and data: Listening Post”
Not so much an installation, but last year I came across DataSpaceTime in Brooklyn, amongst other things they do interesting art with QR codes http://dataspacetime.com/works/